I have a hard time understanding why anyone thinks outrage is an inappropriate reaction to Harvey Wienstein. Guess people have different thresholds for empathy.
Public outrage even more so.
Rational reasoned handling of a situation is the only treatment that's not worse than the malady.
Note how the final statement is empty virtue signaling: "Guess people have different thresholds for empathy" -- in other words, I'm outraged because I have the appropriate amounts of empathy, unlike those that are not participating in mass outrage, who lack it. The idea that someone can have empathy and not fall into fits of outrage is not entertained.