How that question is answered regarding AmEx will shape how future similar cases, many of which will involve tech, are judged. There's no equation between them; it's just what this decision will mean.
How that question is answered regarding AmEx will shape how future similar cases, many of which will involve tech, are judged. There's no equation between them; it's just what this decision will mean.
In United States v. Microsoft [0], Microsoft was found to have abused its dominance as the maker of Windows to compete unfairly against Netscape, which was free (as was IE), among others. The "browser wars" was Microsoft blocking entry into a market where the price was already zero.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor...
What is being debated is if there is a two sided market (two separate groups of consumers), should we add a NEW interpretation that requires harm shown for BOTH groups of consumers rather than just ONE group of consumers.
Yes, and this case was showing the price change for businesses that accept AmEx. T