I'll never understand the portion of the population that reads a relative ranking and then declares that its not true because x still exists there...

"amongst the least corrupt" != "free of corruption"

It's like saying X is among the best schools in the region and sends the most children to university and someone rebutting the statement with "yeah, but billy went there and didn't graduate and didn't go to university."

It's as if their brain is a computer program that's designed to purposely misinterpret information and then argue against the information for the sake of it.

Sorry for the rant. This type of nonsense has been building, or least becoming more obvious, lately in the public and political spheres and I needed to flag it for my sanity.

No I'm not. I'm hybrid British/Italian, suffering thirtyfive-plus years as a resident of the latter has taught me what real corruption and inefficiency look like. I've visited Iceland and found it to be quite amazing both in terms of landscape and society. Hence my reference. I don't think having some instances of corruption actually negates the core import of my statement.

Being listed in the Panama Papers is the same as being corrupt now? Well well..