Hacker News Reader

Dude you seem to have a problem. Beating folks into one inch of their life looks to me a significant overreaction.

I understand your frustration, I've wanted to behave similarly many times in life, but actually doing it is a different thing altogether.

> Dude you seem to have a problem. Beating folks into one inch of their life looks to me a significant overreaction.

Without further articulation on the un-crossable line, this is by no means true. My brother is a bonafide, diagnosed psychopath, so I have much more experience than most in the subject. Sometimes such things are necessary.

Looks like a shitpost, by someone purporting to be a psychopath.

I'm wondering who the psychopath really was in that story...

> cross an un-crossble line

And what line was that? Are you exaggerating the description of the beating or not? Not sure if you actually know what it looks to actually see someone getting beaten to death, and I'm not sure what justification there could be to do that to someone unless they continued to pose a threat to you until the very end of the fight.

I've known people to label others as psychopaths in order to relieve guilt over their own behavior...

Yes, and especially, I don't know if a psychopath would cower in their bed.

Psychopathy goes along with a diminished sensitivity to pain and a generalized dissociative state, and I'd expect after a high-stress event, this dissociation to be extremely pronounced possibly to the point of total detachment from their environment.

Psychopathy is a "fight" response to stress, coupled with a extreme impairment to self-imagine/empathy. Its not a choice, its a lifelong pathology that I struggle to see diminish after a mere fight.

In particular, I wonder if a psychopath would really have much concern for their body in this way. I think they would be more concerned to protect its integrity/image than afraid of damage.

Maybe the were pretending to cower because that's what they thought this chump wanted to see. The way he talks about this situation though -- he comes off strongly as a person self-justifying and duty bound to do something obviously wrong.

>Maybe the were pretending to cower because that's what they thought this chump wanted to see.

To the point of intentionally defecating all over themselves? That sounds far-fetched for anyone, psychopath or not.

I took it as an exaggeration.

This story is not presented in away which is sympathetic at all. We're taking it as a given a person deserves a serious physical assault, and then invited to enjoy the idea of their assault.

It reads as a kind of revenge fantasy.

Whether it is true or not, the preoccupation with the humiliation and defeat of this person; the duty-bound self-justification of what has to be done. The enjoyment of physical violence and the expectation that others will be impressed by this display of physical violence.

Nothing here is very healthy.

Conceivably there are serious predators of people who can be deterred by violence. I don't think this post communicates this point, rather, something more disturbing about its author.

The paralipsis of " While I don't revel in this ..." is revealing.

> I beat them within an inch of their life and then drove them to the hospital.

Um what? You don't understand why the women in this article didn't beat up the larger man, once who had a knife?

The thing is, this is purely cultural. In my country(eastern Europe), victim's male relatives would do this almost certainly and the police would not intervene. There is also posibility that the guy would simply vanish. Criminal organizations also handle psychopaths and child molesters. They have families after all.

Welllllll, most people are way more pacifistic than you are. I can't think of anyone I personally know who's beaten someone else up. For most people, once they've ruled out violence, they've left themselves with no good options.

Sadly, that's all some people seem capable of reacting to. Those who say that violence never solves problems have never had to live around a sociopath.

But unless you actually kill them, by beating them up, don't you just run the risk of the other person escalating the violence and ambushing you later?

You've already established that he's a psychopath and doesn't live by the rules of most normal people, so if you push him down, maybe tomorrow he'll stab you with a knife, run you down with his car, or just shoot you.

He runs a risk of going to prison. If you beat someone "within an inch of their life", then you just committed real crime that gets you to real jail and you will have to live your life with real criminal record.

There was also the chance that you kill somebody. Hitting people is riskier than movies make you believe. Occasionally people die even from a single punch.

Your psychopath wasn't very good at it. The good ones pick their prey more carefully; they pick the people who won't fight back.

You don't understand why people aren't willing to commit felony assault?

While in New York, I was frustrated with my cousin because she got caught multiple times trying to get off the subway. People kept getting in her way.

I told her to just walk out the exit confidently and directly. If people get the sense that they need to move or be bumped, they will move.

I forget what my cousin said to me, exactly, but it made me realize that she was a slight woman whereas I am a not slight man. People really will move out of my way if it appears I will plow through them. If they don't, I will push through them. For her, that strategy doesn't work as well.

My point is - there are some situations, for some people, where fighting is an option. Just like there are some people and situations where fighting isn't an option. Beating someone isn't always an option.