Exactly, this article is just one big disappointment when you read the title and actual article. It's basically some extra money to help it's citizens for the short term.

> it’s not £10,000 per year

It's not? I had doubts about the first occurrence of "two payments of £5,000 paid over two years", which can be parsed various ways. But then later it does say "two annual £5,000 dividends", which is clear. Or are you objecting to the fact that it's limited to two years?

Edit: No, reading this yet one more time, I come to the opposite conclusion: I think it really is £5,000 in the first year, then £5,000 in the second year. That sucks.