> But seriously, the thing that hurts more is that we only require a C89 compiler :/
Indeed. For a glimpse for the non-PG-hackers (like me), there's an ongoing attempt discussed in the PG-hackers mailing list to use stdbool.h.
Indeed. For a glimpse for the non-PG-hackers (like me), there's an ongoing attempt discussed in the PG-hackers mailing list to use stdbool.h.
In C99
(bool)256 == 1
but on systems which emulate bool with, e.g., an 8-bit unsigned char then (bool)256 == 0