Edit: I made a mistake while writing this, I am trying to say be objective about your mistakes but many people took that to mean don't admit your mistakes. I should have been more specific with my terminology.
Edit: I made a mistake while writing this, I am trying to say be objective about your mistakes but many people took that to mean don't admit your mistakes. I should have been more specific with my terminology.
I play soccer 3 times a week, and the number one conflict in the field (up to fist fights) is when a guy plays rough, does a couple of bad tackles, and doesn't apology after them.
Non-apology on a bad mistake = people perceive it as intentional, and rightfully they get angry. Number one way to diffuse situations is to apologize and move on.
On the other hand, people do mistakes in passing, shooting, etc... it is part of the game. A quick acknowledgment of the mistake to your teammates is useful (usually just by a raising of your hand/body gesture), but over-apologizing for normal mistakes is not that useful.
Same in engineering. If you caused a bug/crashed something: Just say "Sorry guys, I am on it/fixing it", is more than enough. No need to send long winded apology emails, but not even acknowledging it makes you look like a sneaky, "self protecting ego at any cost" type of guy/girl, and people lose trust on you.
But yes, you should clean up your messes.
In my experience apologies are not making things better, but saying yeah that’s my fault and moving forward does.
This sounds like an apology to me (just a rather casual one, befitting a minor screwup).
If you e.g. said you’d be at a routine 9:00 work meeting and you didn’t get there until 9:20 because your sick dog vomited on the rug you can make a quick and casual apology like that. If you e.g. cheated on your spouse while you were on a business trip, you shouldn’t leave it at “yeah that’s my fault let’s move forward.”
1. State what you did.
2. State that you regret it. (It wasn't your intention to harm.)
3. State what you'll do mitigate the damage and prevent the problem from repeating.
(Then, after the apology, comes the fix: Do what you said in Step 3.)
Step 1 gets mutual awareness of the relevant facts. Step 2 stakes a claim that you aren't an enemy, and Step 3 (plus the follow-up) backs he claim with a meaningful action.
The goal of the apology is to rebuild trust that you are an ally and you are reliably, not an enemy or a liability.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/liking-the-child-you-lo...
Alternatively, I might just be low on the self-compassion spectrum.
Can't you see that someone who won't even offer a simple verbal agreement that there IS a problem, is probably less likely to be the fixer of a problem than someone who is?