Because your arguments are probably correct. I never claimed otherwise. I took issue with your language. You're contributing to the polarization by using unnecessary, inflammatory, and inaccurate language. That's the problem.
Claiming that across the US women get paid 20% less than men, for doing exactly the same work with exactly the same qualifications with everything aside from genitals being equal is not a conspiracy theory in your opinion? Claiming that society is sexist in that way is not a conspiracy theory?
Even if I grant you that I used harsh language, I take issue with your priorities, I would priorities truth over political correctness.
No. It's just a false claim. False claims aren't conspiracy theories.
> I would priorities truth over political correctness.
It's prioritize*, and prioritization only matters when there's a tradeoff. I'm not sacrificing truth to point out your mistake.
Are you saying that conspiracy theories are all true?
> I'm not sacrificing truth to point out your mistake.
You are wasting 100% of your effort on arguing semantics instead of engaging with my actual argument, sounds like a tradeoff to me. And no, it's not a mistake, don't know where you got that idea from.
(A -/-> B) does not mean that (B -> !A)
When arguments devolve into basic logical errors, there's little hope in finding a resolution, which you're obviously not after anyway.
> You are wasting 100% of your effort on arguing semantics instead of engaging with my actual argument.
You're so intent on picking a fight that you don't realize I agreed with your actual argument above.
Happy trolling.