Hacker News Reader

This is probably correct. Scans of public domain works which are "slavish copies" containing "no spark of originality" were ruled public domain in Bridgeman Art Library vs Corel.

http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/who-owns-the-copyright-...

care to expound on your profession? edit: click their username to read about their profession

What kind of work do you do on the occult?

How did you think AI works?

That depends if you're the AI or the developer.

Or the media.

IANAL, but yeah: shouldn't these works not be under copyright, just on the basis of their age? Wouldn't the "phone book" doctrine apply here, also? There's no creative authorship in a collection of previous works.

I would love to see some of this in your work! Great stuff!

I bet that shirtless youtuber is excited as well.