The only positive thing I took out of that class was the number of other students going "this is bullshit, I'm a first child and am the rebel of the family" or whatever. And it was a good introduction to not trusting authority.
The only positive thing I took out of that class was the number of other students going "this is bullshit, I'm a first child and am the rebel of the family" or whatever. And it was a good introduction to not trusting authority.
If it isn't, wouldn't we state so? I am looking for an utilitarian valid and true argument.
Of course people should know where they come from and what does that mean, just as it's usually important to tell kids if they are adopted or have some serious congenital problem. (Usually because it can mean life or death, as we all seen it in [medical] dramas where people search for organ donors and so on.) But the question of when and how to tell is a big one, and there are probably many good answers, but alas probably all of them are forged in hard compromises between hurting the kid now, or letting them finding it out by accident.
I'd say that only applies if you want it to. Otherwise, are you suggesting that there's a specific age which one needs to reach in order to grok basics of statistics?
Because it isn't and history is full of examples showing it isn't.
Circumstances (social, economic, etc) might sway things in certain directions, but in the same way we can't predict the weather a year out with 100% certainty, it's impossible to predict the course of a human being's life a year from now, let alone 10 or 20.
And that isn't even taking into account changing environments. Ask someone in the 1950's if Obama would become president and most would probably have said "no way"
It's also detrimental and discouraging to people even attempting to achieve their potential. It's like the photo of the horse tied to a chair by a rope. The horse only believes it can't move because it's been trained to think that is its reality.
Philosophies are really only important and useful in as much as they produce a certain result. History is also full of examples of those philosophies being used by the ruling class to suppress their "inferiors" in order to maintain their positions of privilege. Then you get things like the French Revolution.
Not only it will harm/limit your potential to achieve but the exploitation will be rampat