Until then, I firmly place the blame of America's economic woes on one political party. Hint: it's the party of higher taxes.
Until then, I firmly place the blame of America's economic woes on one political party. Hint: it's the party of higher taxes.
What specific parts of the opiod issue do you think a lower corporate tax rate will fix?
Update: found a nice heat map from NY Times; still the issue is there are no absolute numbers or the table that shows how the color gradient in the heat map progresses -- I get tall tales of year over year percentage increases but no absolute numbers to reference against. Is it really that hard to make a decent chart/graphic for this for a org like NYT?
Prescription opiates that lead to street drugs like heroin or illicitly-sourced ones after the prescription runs out, is my understanding. I don't know how the numbers break down in terms of initial exposure - how many bored desparate people were seeking a release, how many people got injured and then got hooked, etc...? But when we end up talking about drugs designed for 2,000lb elephants, it doesn't seem purely a problem of doctors/pharmacists, people are getting it from some unofficial sources.
You might have missed the tax law that just passed, greatly lowering those rates.
Regardless, the statutory rate isn't important; the question is, how much do corporations actually pay after deductions, etc. The rate was 35%, but U.S. corporations actually paid around 20%. Also, overall taxes paid by Americans is among the lowest in the OECD.
http://time.com/money/4862673/us-tax-burden-vs-oecd-countrie...