Sounds like a descriptive non-combative sentence to me. Why do you perceive it as an attack?
You've got an institutionally-accepted construct designed by white European men for their uses, which inadvertently creates a privileged class that implicitly excludes anything that would've been "other" to those designers.
I wouldn't call it an attack, but I'd call it a weird and not well supported (by what's posted here) social justice angle.