Or this could be just a strategy for another goal?
For example, somebody mentioned they are trying hard to redirect attention from something else?
Update: I put the word prove in quotations.
The only thing it has going for it, in my opinion, is that the pilots would have been pretty used to seeing stuff in their cameras and would know the difference between something ordinary and something extraordinary. I do think its more likely that it was some military test plane than something extraterrestrial though, personally.
This is just conjecture though. Its pretty difficult for us to have a meaningful discussion about whether Congresses reaction is noteworthy without knowing for sure what they did or didn't see.
Based on what we have to work with, I'm not seeing anything noteworthy here besides some ATC/pilot folks conversation looking at a black smudge on a grainy sky. I guess unless we got to see the original video, its impossible to tell, really.
> They intentionally degrade the quality of to avoid giving competitors data.
Do we know this for sure? Is there a source for that?
It's a popular culture thing that this term is used to mean "of extraterrestrial origin".
So, is it a UFO? Absolutely, pretty much by definition until someone identifies it.
Is it of extraterrestrial origin? Almost definitely not. It just doesn't make sense that there are aliens hurtling around and occasionally buzzing rural folk in Alabama, and the occasional fighter pilot, for larks. They might be doing that but it's much more likely that they're not.
This is, of course, entirely unrelated to the question of whether or not there is extraterrestrial life (probably) and extraterrestrial civilisation (no idea).
Yes, they legitimately saw something that they could not explain at the time.
> Do you think this proofs there are UFOs?
Of course there are flying objects that haven't been identified by someone. That doesn't mean they are extra terrestrial though.
> Somebody mentioned they are trying hard to redirect attention from something else?
Who's "they"?