> It was good enough that people were willing to pay for it
> We also didn't have the funds to develop or keep testing it
I have to wonder, why did these not cancel each other out?
> We also didn't have the funds to develop or keep testing it
I have to wonder, why did these not cancel each other out?
Something that's paid for and trusted to manage several million dollars worth of inventory has to be a lot more robust.
Investors didn't like the idea. I guess we didn't sell it well as one of them invested in someone else doing the same thing but with less experience.