I wanted to take a moment to discuss these arguments honestly, and that list of net neutrality violations honestly, but I first want to state: While my arguments are against net neutrality I do not take positions against the sentiments these arguments are rooted in. I'm not entirely sure what those who argue this point think ISPs will do that will limit the freedoms of speech, as I've not heard any anticipated methods mentioned, but I can say confidently that free speech is under attack, and has been, regardless of any net neutrality regulations. I do not consider this situation to be a glaring example of why we need net neutrality, I actually consider it to be quite the opposite. As best I can tell this is a situation dealing with agreements between two companies, and sure, Comcast should have been more prepared before taking on an agreement with Netflix, but that's still not a situation concerned with net neutrality. Using Net Neutrality to solve this problem, is a classic case of trying to solve the symptom, and not addressing the cure. I'm not sure this kind of situation has ever existed or been mentioned as a possibility by the ISPs involved in the Net Neutrality issue. I am not against the sentiment or the passion that people feel when they speak of their support for Net Neutrality, just as I'm not against the sentiment of those who want to ban guns because they care about human life, or those who want to continue the war on drugs to try and keep bad substances and ugly situations from those who are better left unexposed to such things.