> BTC is failing as a currency because
> it's in a speculating bubble
This feels pretty inevitable. There's no reliable tie to any economic activity, virtually no raw materials are priced in Bitcoin, and there's no central institution that can price stabilize, so pricing anything in Bitcoin (rather than: x USD/EUR/GBP/whatever as Bitcoin) seems a long way off.It's also -- comparative to fiat or commodities -- massively untested, so price shocks seem inevitable. Regulatory or technical risks that could reduce (or massively inflate) the value seem almost certain.
https://multicoin.capital/2017/09/21/bitcoin-better-digital-... https://medium.com/@tuurdemeester/bitcoin-digital-gold-or-di...
It seems too volatile to use as a unit of account or store of value, but almost perfect as a medium of exchange.
So the best digital currency is one that is valuable to be _held_ but still has high transaction counts.
The article that stimulated my thoughts on the matter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-ix9BDmGie8tPAwrfRKqe9CN...
That is a common misconception on HN, almost repeated on every Bitcoin thread. There is, in fact, evidence usage for payments is sharply increasing:
The increases in transactions are due to HFTs speculating: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-16/high-spee...
Also, 70% of bitcoins won't be moved for 6+ months, making it more speculative than currency: https://www.coindesk.com/analysis-around-70-bitcoins-dormant...
Please go back and read the article, or just look at their homepage...