Hacker News Reader

Comment by criddell | Hacker News Reader

If you have to put everything on a mat, I wouldn't called that wireless charging. That's like saying you can have a wireless network connection as long as your laptop is sitting on a special pad.

I think it has to work over a range of at least a few meters before I'd call it wireless.

View on HN

My 10-yr old daughter described the current form of "wireless charging" as using the shortest possible cord.

That's incredibly insightful. The way I see lots of people charge their phones, you have a long cable so you can continue using it when it's charging. with the wireless charging, you have to leave it locked in place while it charges at 500ma for hours. It's neat at starbucks where I can pick up a quick extra few percent on my battery bar, but otherwise pretty useless.

I used to be ambivalent-to-negative about wireless charging pads, until I figured out that I could get a little desktop stand to set my phone in while I'm doing things on my PC.

I can just plop the phone down without having to fiddle around with uncovering the charging port and finding the cable, and I can still comfortably see and touch the screen if I need to.

Now I'm ambivalent-to-generally-positive, but it's still not exactly a life-changer.

It's not useless. It's great for charging overnight while sleeping, without the hassle of plugging in the cable before you go to sleep.

I imagine some specific types of disabled people might really appreciate it too. Plugging a cord in required a fair amount of dexterity and grip strength; far more than using the phone itself requires. But Qi charging? You could probably nudge it into position with your nose if you had to.

Great point! I never stopped to consider it as an accessibility technology.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com