so what you are saying is that you, or the government, should be a censor and have the right to determine what information other people are allowed to consume?
that seems like a difficult ideology to defend.
that seems like a difficult ideology to defend.
Are you arguing against Net Neutrality?
Governments do have a duty to protect people from predatory companies. When private companies inhibit the freedom of a population, would you argue that governments shouldn't intervene to protect the freedom of the people?
Other countries have the right to develop their Internet with the same freedom that we currently have. (I'm in the US.)
People who are concerned with "freedom" should be looking at the long-term effects of those policies on consumers and smaller entrepreneurs too -- not just the effects on larger companies.