<tin foil hat> Is this pre-empting a union push?
This is pure speculation, but I wonder if Telsa is trying to do last-minute layoffs while avoiding whatever 'lay off laws' there are by claiming that each individual is totally being fired for totally legit individual reasons, for sure, yep.
Honest clarification request: Do you to suggest/worry that they are classifying "agitating for a union" as problematic "conduct with peers"?
(If so, I expect we'll hear if that's the case soon, with a chance of hearing that even if it's not the case. That is a storyline the media would be salivating to run.)
That's the way I read it.
My guess is that since Musk companies don’t feel constrained by rules, they figure they’ll save money in UI taxes by forcing workers to adjudicate their UI benefits. They get the benefit of cooking their balance sheet as an additional benefit.
For the most part this isn't true - only intentional misconduct is grounds for not receiving unemployment.
But, on the other hand, these employees were probably "at will", so the company does not need to give any reason, or even to publicly justify the firings in any way. So it could be that "performance" is the lie that they believe to damage ongoing recruiting efforts the least.
Or it could be that they have determined individual performance assessments to be useless in the face of the more objectively measurable department-wide performance numbers.
All I know for certain is that I won't be sending them any applications or resumes until they can elucidate their motives behind this.
The simplest explanation is that the company isn't making money and investors are getting antsy about bankruptcy.
HR is a cynical business. Requiring stuff like training your outsourced replacement is also a strategy here — the longer you hang on to “undead” employees, the more likelihood they will leave voluntarily.
I imagine a lot of lawyers will gear up here and there will be a lot of eDiscovery.
“You make the rest of us look bad when you don’t donate your weekend to The Company. Wouldn’t you rather make Our Leader richer instead of being with your family?”