If the speech is lawful, then I support it.

Some speech is considered unlawful and that I don't support. That is a longer subject, however.

I don't think we need 'free speech zones' at political rallies. The DNC started that. I don't like how SCOTUS moved the free speech zone away from the building. Things like that.

Lawful speech should be the default. Unlawful speech is afforded no such protections. I'm happy with those limits. Some speech is legitimately harmful.

Read the whoe thread. Even read the people I replied to.

I'll try to help you out, if you want.