Wow, how standards have slipped over the years...
Wow, how standards have slipped over the years...
Somewhere on the web there's a collection of some artist's B&W photogaphs of San Francisco hippies during the early-to-mid 60s when young people began flocking there. This is pre-Jefferson-Airplane SF, when the cool band was the Charlatans and the aesthetic was 19th century retro. People dressed up in ornate Victorian and/or cowboy clothes and looked like what we now call hipsters. There were radical street theater groups like the Diggers and whatnot. (There's a good article about this period here: https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/07/lsd-drugs-summer-..., posted to zero effect by yours truly in 2012: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4123525).
Anyhow, there are tons of pictures in that collection of kids in sleeping bags, or playing guitar, or sitting on the floor of apartments in the Haight. Everyone's hair is short by later standards, looking much like the guy in the poster. The apartments look the same as they do now, except with less furniture. It's a brilliant collection. I wish I could see it again, but it's lost in the sands of my memory, and of course Googling for hippie photos just brings up layers of dreck.
I note that the musical Hair came out in 1967.
It's hard to fathom that what is now the normal-young-person look used to be so radical. Or that it was forged in a handful of years, an astonishingly short time. That's another thing about the photo collection I mentioned: to our eye, the kids all look normal. Deviant social experiment is the last thing that comes to mind.
You mean, how the standards have been appropriated by the mass culture behemoths trying to simplify history into easily digestible ad ridden programs.