Unfortunately for all those with fantastical fantasies about our autonomous car future, when they finally get here they’re going to be slow. And that’s a good thing, even if it means the utopia is still slow and congested.
Unfortunately for all those with fantastical fantasies about our autonomous car future, when they finally get here they’re going to be slow. And that’s a good thing, even if it means the utopia is still slow and congested.
For example: corner to corner crossing is a normal law for pedestrians. Technically, you should always yield the right of way for pedestrians to cross in this manner. Say you are on a two-lane main road through town, and there is tons of traffic. Do you stop at every single corner to let one person cross?
The law says yes. Everyone waiting on you is going to say HELL NO! The people that stop at every corner think they are god's angel doing the right thing, but really they are being a massive sh*t head.
That's just one example of the fuzzy line between breaking the law for the common good or following the law to a tee to the detriment of everyone on the road.
Obviously, the best solution is just better city planning so that pedestrians rarely have to interact with traffic. When they do have to interact with traffic, it should be limited and explicit ( red lights, big marked crosswalks, etc).
Except your “common good” isn’t common. It benefits drivers by mere seconds in exchange for a mortal risk to pedestrians.
Like it or not, but the law is written as is for a reason: pedestrians are the lowest common denominator of society. Everybody is a pedestrian some of the time. When your expectations are for pedestrians to go several minutes out of their way to find a light and crosswalk so they can cross the street, just so you don’t have to slow down for a split second, it is you that is being the complete shithead.
Luckily autonomous cars will soon make all of the enpathy-deficient sociopathic shitheads wait their turn, like they should have been doing all along.
I don't think pedestrians should go way out of their way to cross, I think they should just wait for gaps in traffic.
Likewise drivers should use good judgment and stop for an old lady, but keep going if it's an in-shape jogger.
Drivers expect other drivers to follow the rules of the road, not to be nice.
Did you hear about the woman in Canada [1] who tried to "be nice" and stopped in the middle of a highway to let some ducks cross? She killed a motorcyclist and his passenger.
Don't be nice -- be predictable.
Same is the reason why the bots get rear-ended -- everyone expects them to roll through a stop, who in the world does a complete, 3 second stop?
[1] https://www.google.ca/search?q=Quebec+woman+stopped+for+duck...
And rolling a stop is not following the rules of the road, it is a dangerous violation.
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/quebec-woman-...
She was sentenced in December 2014 to 90 days in jail to be served on weekends, three years' probation and 240 hours of community service, and given a 10-year driving ban.
Regardless, it was dumb of her to stop there. But nowhere near as dumb as your idea that crosswalks are marked by definition. If you're going to give driving advice, don't be wrong. Especially on something like that, where you could easily kill someone and where the penalty could be as severe as manslaughter.
I don't think that's true on a highway or similar road. Stopping in the middle of the highway is very dangerous. You cannot blame the 150km/h+ cars to be able to stop safely in all situations.
You will absolutely be at fault and stuck with the bill in every single rear-ending case, good luck arguing otherwise.
It's definitely true on a highway (which is anything that's not an alley), and even a freeway (which is probably what you meant.)
> Stopping in the middle of the highway is very dangerous.
Failure to maintain adequate following distance on any road is dangerous; encountering stopped traffic or needing to stop rapidly, even on freeways, is a regular occurrence.
> You cannot blame the 150km/h+ cars to be able to stop safely in all situations.
I don't blame cars for anything, I do blame drivers for failing to maintain a safe combination of speed and separation.
And there's virtually no road, freeway or otherwise, where 150km/h+ (93mph+) is a safe and reasonable speed for any driver, irrespective of separation, so I can quite easiky blame a driver for choosing to drive at such a speed in the first place.
Here are the rules by state in the US.
http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/pedestrian-cross...
You should probably learn the rules of the road before you kill someone.