[0] rlegutko.pl/download/en-nieuczciwa-konkurencja-polityka-insight-270320171.pdf, see Chart 8 on page 18.
[0] rlegutko.pl/download/en-nieuczciwa-konkurencja-polityka-insight-270320171.pdf, see Chart 8 on page 18.
Recovery of state aid is uncommon, since most governments simply seek approval for exemptions beforehand (such as the UK for Hinkley Point) and so there are relatively few large incidents of illegal state aid. Especially as it's rare for a government to throw that much money at a single company without great need, illegal or not.
Amazon has to pay back €250 million, which is a pittance compared to their annual EU revenue of over €20 billion, and that was originally triggered by the LuxLeaks revelations, which are also hitting (say) IKEA, which is reportedly being investigated for over €1 billions in illegal tax breaks [1].
One interesting aspect of the Apple case is that the American federal government may not actually mind Apple getting slapped around a bit; Apple not repatriating its foreign profits has been an issue for quite some time, and that only works out for Apple because Apple can park those in tax havens abroad.
[1] http://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-ikea-taxavoidance/eu-re...