I value my compile times more than anything it provides.
I value my compile times more than anything it provides.
If a particular library is costing you more in compile time than it's worth in convenience, just rm -rf it from your Boost install -- better yet, write a script to prepend `static_assert(false, "this header is banned by decree of vvanders");` to the top of the banned headers.
There's plenty in Boost to love -- don't let a few rotten apples spoil the bunch.
Full disclosure: I'm a Boost developer
Last time I looked at boost pulling in any header would pull in all of them, that's why it takes so long to compile. In this day with any modern C++0x11 compiler I don't really see the need for boost.
This has literally never been true.
Reasons not to use boost: - My code is one monolithic spaghetti and I do not use unit tests. - I do not want to learn Boost. - I don't trust template hippies.
Not using Boost is an irrational decision and you know it.