Any applications that can would be either run on clusters of servers to really parallelise the work, or is so custom you may as well buy a threadripper and a custom case.
Hell most apps can barely take advantage of multi core CPU.
I have a 40 core CPU machine with a GTX 1080 Ti GPU. I run deep learning models with 90% GPU utilization and those 40 cores are barely used.
I would love to have 3 more GPUs to run in parallel to test different neural network architectures. Sometimes I'll run a CPU script at the same that processes machine learning data that uses all 40 cores.
I would use 4000 CPU cores and 10 GPUs in a machine if I could get them and I don't even do machine learning full time. I'm personally happy to see this trend of more core counts.
Sure you can write code that nominally use all the cores, but I do not think that the performance increase is going to be linair to the core count.
It's not even down to CPU core count - it would be limited by the speed of a single core.
While you are right that there are very few apps able to take advantage of quad GPUs, for anyone who does serious number crunching it’s not a problem at all to use all of them using popular deep learning frameworks. They aren’t just for deep learning, you can do a lot more with them. And e.g. PyTorch will automatically parallelize certain things across multiple GPUs for you, with near linear speed up.
I wpild be interested to see how pytorch scales GPU wise, relative to CPU clock speed. I am sure there is a point where it will fall off, but not having a 4 GPU system I can't check :)