> and programs written for Windows 3.1 will still work
Not on x86_64.
https://superuser.com/questions/140953/why-cant-a-64-bit-os-...
Not on x86_64.
https://superuser.com/questions/140953/why-cant-a-64-bit-os-...
I maintain that Windows is always a better choice for running win32 applications, unless you don't have that option. I'll also note that I'm not saying Wine is useless, or anything along those lines. I merely take issue with the idea that it runs win32 applications "better" than a system that's designed to be backwards compatible with win32 applications by the same entity that made win32.