Breaking stuff out into fees can make sense when you want to discourage certain behaviors and therefore charge a fee for them. But everyone with a loan will have the device installed, maintained during the term, and removed at the end of the term or on default. There is not a behavior to modify, so these fees are stupid nonsense.
You're talking about the issue of the GPS removal being a separate fee, which is a different issue.
You buy a tesla, but oh it's not really yours to do with as you please. You agreed to terms on the software.
Get fucked by a company. Can't sue anymore, mandatory arbitration clauses.
Farmers can't fix their tractor anymore.
I'm not that familiar with the Canadian legal system, but if its anything like the US its going to take more than a few days to work its way through the legal system. Just give it some time.
The problem is that petty injustices like this are hard to fight because finding other plaintiffs is hard. The only thing connecting them is the defendant, who is not interested in helping them find each other.
(In general, I believe that the sum of the damage of petty injustice is far greater than the major injustices that occasionally get some action on them, and that addressing these smaller injustices is a big juicy problem for society to solve.)