Hacker News Reader

What's wrong with Tezos?

Nothing wrong, I just think it is silly. It's only feature is on-chain voting on protocol changes, something that wouldn't have prevented the Bitcoin hard-fork, for example. It also assumes hard forks are always bad and that everything can be agreed upon with votes, as if everybody were always satisfied with election results.

>It's only feature is on-chain voting on protocol changes

>It also assumes hard forks are always bad and that everything can be agreed upon with votes

Those two statements are incorrect. If you want to understand what it brings to the table, then you should read the position paper: https://www.tezos.com/static/papers/position_paper.pdf

Or watch a presentation by the lead about Governance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OWxGqbknFQ

Reply on news.ycombinator.com