Use of AdNauseum is more of a "fuck you" to companies like reddit or google who have turned the internet from a forum for free expression to a tool for censorship and social control.
The internet gives everyone the freedom to create a community of their own, and it's easier, cheaper and the experience is better than ever when doing so. There are already popular "anything goes" discussion forums (e.g. 4chan, voat) that give much wider room to "freedom of expression", so how have companies like reddit or google prevented others from operating in any fashion they find acceptable within the confines of their own communities? The answer is they haven't.
Reddit is the only site where I've been banned off a single sub. And this was to correct an error referencing my own work and expertise.
As far as I can tell, they've gone overboard on their censoring, marketing and propaganda.
Or do you also think it's ok to steal from Walmart because you don't like their corporate policies?
Playing your ads in my browser is "the rules" now?
If you want to claim it's "the rules", you need a paywall.
Oh, you're not putting up a paywall? Fancy that.
Do you offer legally enforceable indemnity against people getting malware from ads you serve? If not, then you can't really tell them not to block the ads.
"The rules" in this case are that censorship and social control (presumably) exist on the platform. If you don't like that, don't participate.
But don't say, "OMG censorship" and use that to justify defrauding advertisers while continuing to use the free site that you deride.
You can protest legally by blocking ads, but there's such a thing as too much civil disobedience. Its a slippery slope, because this argument can be used to justify DDoS.
It still doesn't justify the topic at hand, which is a program that attacks the ad networks and defrauds the advertisers.