OpenShift for example. It uses docker containers and can be used for both application containers and microservices.
A co-worker who came from AmEx related that they were so unhappy with OpenShift that they dropped the 'f' from the name for nearly every internal discussion.
To be fair, my understanding is that this was open shift 1 & 2. Openshoft three is more or less kubernetes with a few additional features.
Haha love it, what were the primary frustrations?
Keep in mind the distinction between running docker containers and what parent said: "You don't need Docker Inc for that"
rkt, containerd, LXC, runC, OpenShift. There are others, too. rkt and OpenShift seem to be the most common ones that aren't Docker.
Openshift runs on top of Docker. It is essentially "Enterprise Kubernetes"... a few more features and support baked in.
Openshift doesn't need docker though; it's an implementation detail. You see Dockerfiles, but you don't see docker itself.
What others? At this point you seem to be just naming things. containerd and runc are both parts of Docker, and OpenShift is a PaaS that runs on Docker.