The ol' security through tech press approach. Seriously though, you can't have the security of your devices dependent on whether or not someone has come up with a catchy name for their exploit. The exploits with names like broadpwn and stagefright are the exceptions, not the rules, there are plenty of critical CVE's that have never had cool names or tech articles written about them. Even if an exploit has a cool name and some press, what if people don't upvote it when it gets posted here (or reddit/wherever)?
As you're clearly entirely clueless about security, how do you know this?
If you primarily get your security news via the press, how do you know that they aren't simply missing most things?
No, this is fucking stupid. Most security related bugs get zero visibility, Linux for example still has a policy to quietly patch them.
Well, now I'm definitely convinced...
> Most security related bugs get zero visibility, Linux for example still has a policy to quietly patch them.
Most security bugs don't need your attention either, because they don't have widespread exploits.
Read the prior comments; don't just curse in reply to a single sentence while ignoring all the prior context.
But if you do anything interesting with your life this simply isn't an useful argument.