Hacker News Reader

Do we expect them to provide feedback like "this algorithm is not right because XYZ" or "I fixed this algorithm to work correctly". Those are very different levels of service and I think defining exactly what someone should expect will really helps set expectations.

I also think that this seems absurdly cheap, and I can't imagine it scaling with quality reviewers. Would love to be wrong on this one.

View on HN

Thanks for the feedback! I think you are right that we should add more expectations/FAQ section to our website. We expect the feedback to be more of the former, suggestions and comments but still up to the code author to correct and implement. Re: pricing: we are still working out the details of pricing but we believe that we should be able to get quality reviewers at this price. We expect our reviews/custom review client over time to help increase our efficiency to drive costs down.

To clarify, our pricing page is probably too confusing for folks at this stage -- we aren't saying that we can provide unlimited reviews for $49. Rather, teams and individuals can expect costs to scale up from that baseline.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com