From your paper: "We assume that the victim system runs a filesystem on top of MLC NAND flash-based SSD."
It seems very naive to be surprised that people would assume this is an attack on SSDs.
From your paper: "We assume that the victim system runs a filesystem on top of MLC NAND flash-based SSD."
It seems very naive to be surprised that people would assume this is an attack on SSDs.
If you want to critique the flash paper, or how this paper represents that papers findings, you should turn your attention to:
Yu Cai, Augata Ghose, Yixin Luo, Ken Mai, Onur Mutlu, and Erich Haratsch. “Vulnerabilities in MLC NAND Flash Memory Programming: Experimental Analysis, Exploits, and Mitigation Techniques”. In: 23rd IEEE International Sympo- sium on High Performance Computer Architecture . 2017.
I found a PDF link too: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b9bc/a3c9f531002854af48de12...
I don't agree that the authors of the present paper are exempt from criticism for this reason.