Wait, where do you see anywhere in the ruling a decision about anything other than whether the judge should've been recused or not...?
It's very short because the appeals court ruled that the district court was correct "without opinion".
Where in "Akins also argues that the district court erred by granting the motions todismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendants and by denying his ownmotion for partial summary judgment" is there anything about filming anyone?