I am discussing real issues. He was using junk science and pseudoscience to justify his claims. That means he's not doing it in good faith, and is more likely than not using those things to justify his bigotry. His post was filled with dog whistles. His part about castration and feminimity is an example.

If you want to address real issues, then you need to address how a team can cope with one of their members, a member who likely is one of the people who is giving reviews of them, has come out saying that they do not deserve to be there simply because of their gender or their race.