I just made a film, it's a really common misunderstanding that films need to be 90+ minutes long to be a feature film.
The reason people are reacting negatively is not because of the truth value of your point: it’s because your point was pedantic and irrelevant.
Is that time the length of a feature film? Yes. Many of them. Does that mean all feature films have to be that long? No. Are most feature films the general public encounters ~90-120 mins? Yes.
So you’re not adding to the discussion. You’re being that “well, actually...” guy.
I’m not trying to rag on you to be mean, I’m trying to help you understand why it came across poorly.
> I’m not trying to rag on you to be mean
Then downvote and move on, don't reply "Dude" :)
I'd be curious to see your work if you have an IMDb link though. If you're going to reply with anything other than a link to your work, please don't.
The only thing that made it into IMDb was the animated short that got into Cannes. I’m well out of that area now.
It’s called “Ignorance is Bliss”, if you’re interested.