With the wheels down, they would just tear through the hull of the lower plane, right?
With the wheels down, they would just tear through the hull of the lower plane, right?
That said, I suspect the following three crashes give _some_ indication of what might have happened:
USAir 1493 - 737 collides with a turbo-prop on landing; the smaller plane is essentially crushed by the 737
Asiana 214 - Landing gear and tail clip seawall on approach
Tenerife disaster - 747 strikes the side of a second 747 a few seconds after leaving the ground on takeoff; engines, lower fuselage and main landing gear struck the plane. 583 fatalities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAir_Flight_1493 / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214 / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster
Hulls are so fragile that they've often shred up in flight (De Havaillan, DC-9). Landing is around 200-250kmh only, but planes have caught fire just sliding on runways or terrain. The quantity of jet fuel immediately means catastrophe.
They’d have flattened onto each other in a big squash that blew fuel everywhere.
It would have probably continued due to momentum as a fireball towards the 3 other fully loaded planes.
Basically it could have been a 5 fully loaded plane bowling alley of flaming metal at 150mph
OTOH, he could have very well collided with the other Airbus on the taxiway rapidly halting his forward momentum and exploding into a fireball subsequently taking out everything for half a mile ahead.
What's alarming her is the distance of the Air Canada jet to the ground, less the tail of the Airbus = this guy was FEET AWAY from clipping that jet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y33N0raKZBo
[EDIT: fixed link]