Chavez claimed he was a socialist because that has positive connotations over there and the US wanted to portray him as a socialist for the opposite reason.
But check
* percentage of workforce work in public sector
* government expenditure as % of GDP
* percentage of workforce that is part of a union
* taxes
* state enterprises
* the welfare and state provided benefits
Compare all of these to a country like Norway (richest or 2nd richest country in the world, also an oil state of sorts). You'll find that if Venezuela is socialist, than Norway must be a straight up reincarnation of the USSR.
Arguing on the internet is so much fun :p
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL.ZS?year_high...
You don't pay less taxes than many Europeans. You just get a worse deal from them.
The USA has already socialized 40-50% of its healthcare through the VA and Medicare/Medicaid. We also spend a lot more on healthcare and get worse results than other countries with pure universal systems, so you can't say this is about "saving money."
Which is fine, at least under capitalism you're allowed to criticize it.
What does this even mean?
Are you under the impression that capitalism gave the world free-speech?
Socialism clearly isn't working here, but I wouldn't say it's at fault for the current struggles.