Could you summarize what makes debt worse than having investors?
I'm curious, it seems counterintuitive, with debt you don't have to give up a part of your company or lose any control.
I'm curious, it seems counterintuitive, with debt you don't have to give up a part of your company or lose any control.
And at the same time an investor could also push you into bankruptcy by suggesting, supporting or blocking certain decisions.
It's like knight and bishop in chess. True, they work differently, but they are all just pieces on the same board, used in the same game to achieve the same goal.