"Eliminating heading for children 10 and under
Limiting the amount of heading in practice for children between the ages of 11 and 13"
Other sports, like football, present a much harder challenge. Even if you remove direct head contact as a variable, most aspects of tackling can result in concussions. The reason football is uniquely controversial is that minor concussions are mostly inevitable and severe concussions are commonplace.
By contrast, the most likely way to get a concussion in soccer is to head the ball, which isn't fundamental to gameplay. In any sport, you might run into another player at high speed but that's not typically a core part of the gameplay. Football is controversial because it's hard to fix.
FWIW, though, I've not heard that point either.
Tennis, golf, swimming, weightlifting, etc - probably have a pretty low incidence of concussion. Stuff with teams and fast movement are probably most suspect; hockey and football would intuitively seem like the worst offenders.
"Based on the national estimate, the majority of concussions resulted from participation in football (40.5%, n = 55 007), followed by girls' soccer (21.5%, n = 29 167), boys' soccer (15.4%, n = 20 929),..."
So 40.5% of concussions in football and 36.9% in combined boys/girls soccer.
source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2140075/
In addition to concussions, football players are also believed to receive repeated microtrauma from running into each other repeatedly, which contributes to CTE.
Football is a full contact sport. It is inherently more dangerous. Collisions in soccer happen accidentally. They happen intentionally in football.
In addition there are new restrictions on heading the ball in soccer for younger kids, which will likely make the game a bit safer.
I don't have stats available for middle school, but earlier than that the players don't hit nearly as hard, as they have considerable lower mass and speed.
Not sure where your 3x number comes from, but I don't think we need to include YMCA recreational league soccer any more than we need to include flag football.
I didn't see that your study was high school and college only.
It seems that girls suffer much higher rates of concussions in all sports likely do to less developed neck muscles according to this [1].
So you'd have to compare concussion rate in football vs boys soccer to get a real comparison.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/recruiting-insider/wp/20...
>So 40.5% of concussions in football and 36.9% in combined boys/girls soccer.
If 21.5% of girls (~6270) and 15.4% of boys (~3223) get concussions then 9493 (6270 + 3223) received concussions out of 50096 (20929 + 29167) total participants. 18.9% (9493 / 50096) for soccer vs 40.5% for football.
Or, if you can figure out the relative difference between the number of boys and girls who play soccer, you can do a weighted average of the percentages.
Either way, adding the percentages is completely incorrect.
EDIT: http://www.usyouthsoccer.org/media_kit/keystatistics/ suggests that the split is roughly equal -- in 2008 it was 52% boys and 48% girls.
With that said, the correct weighted value is more like 21.5x.48 + 15.4x.52 = 18.3%, which is significantly less than the 40.5% you quoted for football.
55007 for football - 40.5% of 135901
20929 for boys soccer - 15.4% of 135901
29167 for girls soccer - 21.5% of 135901
50096 combined soccer
50096/135901 = 36.9% of all concussions were from soccer.