Hacker News Reader

Comment by Analemma_ | Hacker News Reader

Is this going to work? Grantland was doing everything right, by the standards of people who demand more substantive sports journalism: they had talented writers, well-researched longform articles, and no clickbait. They still went under. I’m rooting for these guys, but despite what people claim, I don’t know if the market is there.

View on HN

Listening to Simmons over the last year, it is clear that part of Grantland's failure was being under the ESPN umbrella and not chasing what ESPN considered "small dollar" advertisements and partners. In a recent podcast, Simmons said that his BS Report podcast (an iTunes Top 10 mainstay) was just thrown in with the Subway deal for years.

It is also my interpretation that had Grantland and Simmons not been so intertwined, it may have had a better shot at surviving the messy Simmons/ESPN divorce.

TheRinger seems significantly more 'short form' than Grantland did

not sure what that says about the economics of long form sports journalism

Simmons has touched on that in the past. He talks a lot about some of what happened at Grantland, ESPN, and decisions he made re: The Ringer on the July 12, 2017 of the Bill Simmons Podcast titled, "Inside the Evolution of ESPN With Jim Miller and Bryan Curtis."

Here is the link to his podcast section on The Ringer: https://theringer.com/bill-simmons-podcast-d3868264a984

If you'll notice nearly everything he talks about is in relation to their podcasts, not the long form articles. There was a businessweek article a few weeks back that says The Ringer makes nearly (or perhaps all) of its money on podcasts. I'm not sure it's fair to compare The Ringer or Grantland to other sports journalism websites because The Ringer is a podcast company that happens to also write some articles.

This article speaks to the economics pretty well I think. The Ringer should do the same thing. From what we know they make nearly (all?) of their money on podcast ads anyways.

I seem to remember Grantland having all sorts of stuff about culture, movies, music, etc. As a sports fan, Grantland always felt to me to be a bit like Slate or NY Mag crossed with Sportsnet: The Magazine.

To be fair, Grantland was an ESPN subsidiary. I believe this model can be a success, but the definition of "success" for The Athletic and for ESPN are probably very different.

Yes, if anything Grantland was only the latest example of how bad sharecropping is for the tenant.

Grantland was most likely in the red when it was shutdown.

I would hazard a guess and say the market is probably there for publications covering beats that have fans/readers passionate enough to spend money.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com