Sexual harassment is not a very civil approach either.
She states that she was inspired to share her experience (with photographic evidence) base on accounts of other women coming forward in a similiar manner.
She states that she was inspired to share her experience (with photographic evidence) base on accounts of other women coming forward in a similiar manner.
Being inspired to skip the trial and personally decide to put somebody in the pillory is an understandable, but deeply flawed motivation.
The author can, of course, make every accusation. The publication however should not make the crime appear to be a secured fact. Breaching the journalistic objectivity might be a current trend but is intellectually dishonest and no service to the cause.
This looks more like vigilantism than a serious conversation.