It's a fair point on the long-term cost of sexual harassment combined with an uncivilized, one-sided public accusation. Do I miss something here?

Which part of the argument could not have been made without ruining a reputation through TC reach? How far are those accusations confirmed?

I've no stake in any of those people and I am not particularly opinionated about the current cultural matters surrounding harassment, but this is not a very civil approach and I am not sure it does a favor for the cause of greater awareness on the issue.