I bet OP understands that personal feelings are subjective.
That website makes someone a whole bunch of money. That doesn't mean that website isn't awful.
That website makes someone a whole bunch of money. That doesn't mean that website isn't awful.
This is like bikeshedding the definitions of privacy, DRM, net neutrality, etc. Most people just don't give a shit, no matter how loud the minority is that demonizes things like throwing a newsletter subscription popup on a website.
I think you need a new word to describe your (valid, in a way) opinion.
Thinking others should change their opinion because you don't understand subjectivity is absurd.
Most people would care if they knew the difference, they do not. It is up to those who know to tell them, to make a stance and denounce the shit.
Would they?
> they do not. It is up to those who know to tell them, to make a stance and denounce the shit.
Counterpoint: How do you differentiate people who have made a choice through inadvertent ignorance vs those who have made a different choice than you because they value different things?
E.g. not caring if they harm their hearing, liking the frequency response of Bose over more neutral speakers, having other things they'd rather be doing than read audiophile forums, or rather save $500+ and use an inferior speaker
Usually people regret this later in life. I guess we fundamentally disagree on the ability of people to make good decisions that they won't regret later and whether or not we should help people avoid doing things they will surely regret.
> or rather save $500+ and use an inferior speaker
This is hyperbole, I'm talking about the difference between a $3 set of earbuds and $20. I'm not saying everyone should have the highest quality gear available.
$125k/month in gross booked travel may not be a whole bunch of money. Typically, only portions of the travel have commissions, and not huge percentages either.
It could grow of course.