> The document, dated April 11, 2016, references “Pre-Signing Bad Acts,” which covers behavior including fraud and trade-secrets theft, as well as “Post-Signing Specified Bad Acts.” Misconduct in the latter time period wouldn’t be indemnified, “with the exception of retaining confidential information solely in the memory of an employee.”

I dunno, sounds like they were indemnifying him for anything he stole pre-aquisition. The "in memory" clause just means that they won't defend him for anything he went on to steal after signing the contract. Still looks pretty suspicious for Uber.