Which suggests that... wait for it... there's not some huge fundamental design/manufacturing flaw in the iPhone's antennae that Apple didn't notice or wants to cover up. Instead, it's just another cell phone that's picky about signal strength, like pretty much every other cell phone ever manufactured. Hell, Macrumors published video from 2008 showing an old iPhone doing exactly the same things people are now claiming to be a brand-new phenomenon unique to the iPhone 4:
http://www.macrumors.com/2010/06/23/iphone-4-signal-declines...
Add to this the fact that the "story" started at an outlet which has a pretty big and well-known axe to grind against Apple, and I feel like we need a whole lot more than some youtube videos and a bunch of "me too" posts in a forum to make a big issue out of this.
When I was a kid watching tv with an indoor antenna, anytime there was poor reception I'd go and hold the antenna and reception would improve or get a lot worse.
So, I've no problems believing that this is an issue, that it affects different people differently at different times, and that Apple knew about it and made those shells as a fix (a trade-off in exchange for greater compactness of the device) for those who want it.
I wonder if this means I shouldn't get the iPhone4? ;-)
- it only affects some units
- some people are exhibiting superstitious behavior (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._F._Skinner#Superstition_in_t...)
- some combination of the two
There is nothing remarkable about a new product having issues. What matters here is that there's some mythology about Apple perfection that just isn't (and has NEVER been) backed by actual reality. So far there's the breakable unbreakable screen, the easily scratched unscratchable back, serious colour issues in the screen, and a possible antenna issue (hey, who ever holds a phone in their hand? BTW - Is Jobs left handed?), and that's among a very small number of pre-shipments. We shall see.
These are delays/contstaints rather than failures, but all together they point to the potential problems you give yourself when you need to differentiate your new models so much via novel product design.
Engadget/AOL doesn't have any big and well-known axes to grind, right?
Here's my take on it: Galvanically shorting the WiFi and GSM antennas is indeed an inherent design problem that Apple solved through some clever adaptive capacitance circuit or something. That solution is working on your phone, but on a certain lot of them, it's not properly adapting.
Using a case may basically become a requirement.
Either way, it can't be the way Apple would like to start this release, since they want to make units that go to new customers rather than to replace units already bought. I just hope they find the problem quickly and are open about the issue.
What? They've had tons of first-party accessories.