Hacker News Reader

Comment by algesten | Hacker News Reader

Who doesn't want to repair a broken laptop that is just out of warranty, but maybe still have a few good years to go?

Honestly, like 95% of people.

Practically, even if Microsoft did want to make the device disassemble friendly and was even willing to spend the engineering dollars to make that happen, I think they'd be turned away by the fact making a "polished" device that's easily disassembleable would increase failure rates. The bonded materials greatly increase strength over a set of spaced screws/latches into thin material.

> Honestly, like 95% of people... @Raidion

If you have to use the word /honestly/ in your communications, this leads readers to believe that the remainder of your information is falsehoods.

Also, please link to the studies & polls that show %95 of users do not want serviceable, fixable, or user upgradeable laptops.

I doubt the veracity of your claim.

I'm the 95%! Honestly, if something is going to take me more than 10 minutes to do, and the risk of breaking something is higher than none, I'm of the mindset to either pay to have a professional fix it (or break it for free), or rip out the hard drive and buy a new laptop.

All these higher end laptops all come with pretty decent warranties so for a couple hundred bucks you get it either repaired or swapped out. Then again, I'm a tone deaf American with a large amount of disposable income...

I am proudly of the '5%'. Some things I have done include: Thinkpad (some ancient Pentium-133 model) motherboard (30 min), Fujitsu T4020 fan (4 hours), Fujitsu T4200 SSD (2x, 10min max each), various hard drives, HP Pavilion 17 fan (3 hours), Motion M1400 memory and hard drive (converted to a PATA SSD after much research, 30min), and the M.2 SSD on my HP Elite X2. The fan replacements in particular were not fun but it seemed wrong to throw them away for something as basic as a $11 fan (buried in the internals as it was), which is why my current laptop (Elite X2) has no moving parts whatsoever.

Sometimes you really don't want to wait for a professional.

95% wouldn't want to repair their 1 year old (default warranty) mac if it breaks? What kind of bubble are you living in?

I'd pay a professional to do it or sell it for parts/repair. Working on small mobile electronics requires skills and experience. It's very easy to accidentally cause damage that's worse than the problem you were trying to fix in the first place.

depends what's broken. If it's a key on the keyboard, definitely. If it's the screen, maybe. If its something internal... maybe not.

In my laptops, I have replaced internal hard drives and RAM many times. Sometimes a wireless module or CPU. Neither of them was broken, though, just upgraded stuff.

There is a debate raging over "right to repair" and the consumer is losing. Honestly, I can't continue buying $1000 smart phones. It's just not worth it. And no, I'm not going to insure them, either. That whole concept is a bag of dicks.

Does "right to repair" have anything to do with "repairability"? There are definitely some things, like iPhones, that might not be possible to build in a repairable way without decreasing the quality of the product. Perhaps Surface is like that, too.

This is the biggest conundrum for me. Every engineering decision is a compromise. There are very few cases where making a choice by going down one path isn't a compromise where you're getting one thing but giving up something else. Obviously user-serviceability is a good property for a device to have, but that has a cost as well (a device that is lower quality or less desirable in other ways).

I think right to repair is a separate debate. The right to repair movement is about a company being able to sue you for attempting the repair at all. This is about the company doing its darndest to physically prevent repairs. As iFixIt shows, you're welcome to try.

Right to repair is also usually centered around software, since that's the crux of the argument used by companies like John Deere. JD technically isn't telling people they can't repair things, just that they can't "hack" their software (an "IP infringement"), which so happens to be a necessary step in repairs.

There's no differences in end effect if you're prevented from fixing your own stuff due to law or deliberate engineering.

Yes there is. One is by force of law, the other is simply a reverse engineering problem. If you can put it together, you can take it apart, it doesn't mean it will be easy though.

It goes beyond software, I'm more than capable of replacing dead SMT components on a board - but I can't get board layouts or official replacement parts for anything these days.

I have a legal right to repair my own products or have a third party do it, but because the manufacturer is under no obligation to make it easy everyone gets screwed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com