Hacker News Reader

"I would say he's not the root cause of the issues but he is the root cause of Uber's success."

I can't agree with that statement. He's responsible for both. He doesn't get to take credit for the good and ignore the bad.

Are you saying it's impossible? Or just not fair?

Good or bad, you reap what you sow.

You do reap what you sow? Or you ought to reap what you sow?

I am going to say it's impossible. He is responsible for the company. That means both the good and the bad.

And his past actions have shown that's not far off; that he does behave in a manner consistent with Uber's bad actions.