Hacker News Reader

Comment by qq66 | Hacker News Reader

If you would truly be homeless if you went bankrupt, then yes, it's not prudent.

But many of the people who would be in this position have a safety net if things go bad. They can default on their debt, move in with a friend or relative, and get a job and get back on their feet.

View on HN

I'm kind of shocked at how casually you say 'They can default on their debt'. What a fcked up attitude.

I thought one of the biggest advantage of US financial system is for people to take risks with their business but can fail without a huge hit on their future, i.e. bankruptcy.

Without this attitude, you'll have people that is a lot more hesitant to start a business.

Yeah, there's been some research on this, showing a positive relationship between how "forgiving" a country's personal bankruptcy laws are and the level of entrepreneurship in that country: http://aler.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/ahn008v1

Taking undue risks is not a good thing. The greatest thing about a makret economy is that there is both profit and loss. Loss is to keep you from producing things no-one really wants, and is important. Without any risk, sure, people could do creative things they wouldn't have odne otherwise, sure. But you would soon see that the value produced in a society like that would be very small compared to a society where you have to turn a profit.

Wrong, because most of the debt at the age we're talking about are student loans which are non-dischargeable.

Sorry, reply was meant for the parent :(

What are they going to do, throw you in debtors' prison? Even in that case, all it really means is that you will have to work more to pay it (and the extra interest and penalties) off later.

There's no shame in defaulting on your debt because you tried to create a new economically productive company and failed. That's what bankruptcy is best used for. It's not like leasing a BMW.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com