"Leadership is a privilege that can easily be taken away. The talented people who work for me have a plenty of options and can leave at any moment. I therefore treat them like unpaid volunteers"
Interesting perspective.
Interesting perspective.
Of course the people under him get paid (perhaps not by Satya himself), so what does he mean? That the leadership is unpaid? One would expect that leadership means a higher paid position, because leaders are applying a more specialised labour.
Am I looking at this the wrong way round, or being obtuse?
So I've worked near corporate people who obviously hated their jobs. Being in a team with such people is not a good thing for you or the project.
Similarly I was part of a volunteer team that formed ad-hoc to save a huge programing contest. Every person was there because they wanted to be there. It was a whole lot of fun and an effective team.
In the sense that when you run a volunteer organisation you want to keep people coming back